Il Nuovo Postiglione - Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump presidential immunity claim

NYSE - LSE

CMSC	-0.53%	20.81	$
BCC	2.64%	79.21	$
RIO	0.42%	103.27	$
CMSD	-0.34%	20.69	$
RYCEF	0.7%	19.92	$
RBGPF	0%	70	$
NGG	-0.06%	78.12	$
GSK	-1.96%	49.89	$
BCE	-0.59%	23.67	$
BTI	-1.12%	55.35	$
JRI	-0.58%	12.14	$
VOD	1.89%	16.9	$
BP	0.52%	43.81	$
RELX	-3.21%	35.51	$
AZN	-1.27%	162.7	$

Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump presidential immunity claim

POLITICS 28.02.2024

Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump presidential immunity claim / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

The US Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to hear Donald Trump's claim that as a former president he enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution, as the 2024 White House candidate faces dozens of state and federal charges.

Text size:

The court scheduled arguments in the high-stakes case for the week of April 22 and said Trump's trial on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election would remain on hold for now.

Trump had been scheduled to go on trial for election interference on March 4 but the proceedings have been frozen as his presidential immunity claim wound its way through the courts.

The Supreme Court said it would address the question of "whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office."

It will be among the most consequential election law cases to reach the court since it halted the Florida vote recount in 2000 with Republican George W. Bush narrowly leading Democrat Al Gore.

A three-judge appeals court panel ruled earlier this month that the 77-year-old Trump has no immunity from prosecution as a former president.

Trump's claim to be immune from criminal liability for actions he took while in the White House is "unsupported by precedent, history or the text and structure of the Constitution," the judges said in a unanimous opinion.

"We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," they said.

The ruling was a major legal setback for Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and the first ex-president to be criminally indicted.

The appeals court put the immunity ruling on hold to give Trump the opportunity to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Special Counsel Jack Smith filed the election conspiracy case against Trump in August and had been pushing hard for the March start date for his trial.

Lawyers for the former president have sought repeatedly to delay the trial until after the November election, when Trump could potentially have all of the federal cases against him dropped if he wins the White House again.

- Colorado case -

Trump also faces 2020 election interference charges in Georgia, and has been indicted in Florida for allegedly mishandling classified information.

He was impeached twice by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives while in office -- once for inciting an insurrection -- but acquitted both times by the Senate.

The immunity case is one of two election-related cases before the Supreme Court.

The Colorado Supreme Court barred Trump in December from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot in the state because of his role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol by his supporters.

Trump appealed the Colorado ruling and the conservative-majority Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in early February.

Both conservative and liberal justices expressed concern during arguments about having individual states decide which candidates can be on the presidential ballot this November.

M.Lombardi--INP

Featured

Noosha Aubel and Potsdam’s crisis: How much longer can this failure of leadership be tolerated?

Potsdam does not need to be a champion at shamefully dragging its feet. The state capital, Potsdam, needs an administration that protects, makes decisions and actually organises help. In the case of two-year-old Heidrun, an examination of the available documents reveals that this is precisely what is lacking: A child with multiple severe disabilities, classified as GdB 100 and care level 4, is unable to make use of an available nursery place because the necessary support is lacking and those responsible at Potsdam City Council are unable to provide evidence of documents allegedly having been delivered – which once again highlights the disastrous handling of important documents under the currently questionable professional and managerial supervision of Lord Mayor Noosha Aubel (50, independent) at Potsdam Town Hall.

US envoy sees 'movement' toward three-way talks with Russia, Ukraine

A top US envoy on Monday touted progress in weekend discussions with Ukraine and Russia, raising the prospect of reviving three-way peace talks to end Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II.

Thousands bid farewell to Bosnian Serb war criminal in Belgrade

Bosnian Serb war criminal Ratko Mladic was buried in Belgrade on Monday, in a service attended by thousands, sparking accusations from Brussels of the "glorification" of a man who died while serving a life sentence for genocide.

EU chief announces 200-mn-euro investment package for Greenland

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Monday announced a 200-million-euro ($232-million) package for Greenland during a visit to the Danish autonomous territory, which she vowed to support in the face of US President Donald Trump's ambitions.